India-Pakistan Kashmir dispute

India-Pakistan arguments over Jammu and Kashmir just keep looping around? One side makes a firm statement, the other hits back the next day, and we’re right back in the same old debate. That’s exactly what played out this week.

On 4 September the UN General Assembly passed a resolution called “Correct the Map.” The whole point was to get world maps that show continents closer to their real sizes — especially making Africa look bigger instead of the usual stretched versions we all learnt in school. 164 countries voted yes. Only the United States said no. India supported it.

But New Delhi wasn’t leaving any grey area about its own borders. On Sunday, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal spelled it out clearly. India voted in favour because it liked the basic idea of fairer maps. He made sure to add that the resolution doesn’t approve any particular map or the way countries draw their borders. It doesn’t deal with political boundaries or disputed territories at all.

Then came the important bit: India’s territory, including Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, has to be shown exactly as it appears on India’s official map. Anything inaccurate or misleading is simply not acceptable. The country’s position on its land and sovereignty, he said, is clear, consistent and non-negotiable.

That was Sunday. By Monday morning Pakistan had already replied.

Islamabad’s foreign office called India’s claims “baseless” and said they go against internationally recognised facts. According to Pakistan, India’s unilateral steps and what it calls illegal occupation cannot change the disputed status of Jammu and Kashmir. The official UN maps that show the region as disputed, they said, remain the only proper way to represent its legal position. India’s own maps and sovereignty claims, they added, don’t change anything.

It’s the same argument we’ve heard for years. India insists the entire former princely state, including the parts under Pakistani control, is an integral part of India. Pakistan says it’s a disputed territory that should be decided by the old UN resolutions calling for a plebiscite. Neither side has budged on that in decades.

Maps have always been a sensitive topic between the two. Whenever an international body, a newspaper or even a new resolution touches the issue, both governments jump in to defend their version. India sees any map that treats the area as disputed as a challenge. Pakistan sees India’s official maps as an attempt to erase the dispute.

This particular UN resolution wasn’t about Kashmir at all. It came from African countries wanting maps that stop making Europe and North America look oversized. India backed that principle while making sure no one could twist it into something about its borders.

Still, the Kashmir angle was always going to come up. The language on both sides is familiar by now — “baseless,” “illegal occupation,” “integral part,” “disputed territory.” The words get repeated so often they almost sound routine, yet both countries keep using them because the claim still matters deeply to each.

Nothing on the ground has changed because of these statements. The Line of Control is the same, the diplomatic freeze is the same. It’s just the latest reminder that when it comes to Jammu and Kashmir, neither New Delhi nor Islamabad is willing to let even a technical discussion about maps pass without putting its position on record.

Sources: Hindustan Times, Indian Express, India Today, Geo News, Arab News and official statements from India’s MEA and Pakistan’s Foreign Office, 6–7 September 2026.

@⁨Rohit Manral⁩

Author